As the race to expand broadband connectivity accelerates, advocates are calling for a technology-neutral approach to guide infrastructure development and policy decisions. This strategy emphasizes the use of diverse technologies—from fiber and fixed wireless to satellite and emerging innovations—to deliver connectivity tailored to the specific needs of different communities.
What is Technology Neutrality?
Technology neutrality is the principle that no single technology should be favored over others in broadband deployment initiatives. Instead, the focus should be on outcomes: achieving reliable, affordable, and scalable connectivity. Proponents argue that this approach allows policymakers and providers to leverage a mix of technologies best suited to local conditions, such as geographic challenges or population density.
“Technology neutrality ensures that we meet people where they are,” said Shirley Bloomfield, CEO of NTCA – The Rural Broadband Association. “Different regions have different needs, and a one-size-fits-all solution doesn’t work when it comes to broadband.” (NTCA Official Website)
Bridging the Digital Divide
Advocates for technology neutrality argue that it is essential for closing the digital divide, particularly in rural and underserved areas where deploying fiber-optic networks—the gold standard for connectivity—may be prohibitively expensive or logistically challenging. Instead, combining technologies like fixed wireless, satellite, and even hybrid models can provide effective, interim solutions while laying the groundwork for future upgrades.
Jennifer Harris, Director of the Texas Broadband Development Office, highlighted this approach: “In areas where geography makes fiber deployment difficult, alternatives like satellite or fixed wireless can provide a lifeline. The goal should always be to connect people, not to dictate how it’s done.” (Texas Comptroller’s Office)
Federal Funding and Flexibility
Federal programs like the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) initiative have sparked debates about the role of technology neutrality. While these programs prioritize scalable, future-proof technologies like fiber, states and localities have advocated for more flexibility to address their unique connectivity challenges.
“We need funding guidelines that reflect real-world conditions,” said Mark Davis, Executive Director of the Wyoming Broadband Advisory Council. “A rigid focus on one technology can exclude viable solutions that work well for rural areas.” (Wyoming Broadband Advisory Council)
Industry Support
The telecommunications industry has also thrown its weight behind technology neutrality. Companies developing satellite and fixed wireless solutions argue that their technologies complement fiber deployments, filling gaps where traditional infrastructure is infeasible.
WISPA is pleased by NTIA’s release today of proposed guidance designed to maximize finite BEAD funds by clarifying how “alternative technologies,” such as unlicensed fixed wireless access (uFWA) and LEOs, can be used where it costs too much to deploy fiber in BEAD deployments. The expense and lag to deployment of fiber have caused states to recognize the need for more flexibility in the program, a view WISPA shares. Alternative technologies can cost-effectively, rapidly, and reliably go where fiber economically cannot. NTIA’s recognition that areas where uFWA and LEOs are already providing service and areas funded by government programs should be off the table for BEAD is a welcome instruction that states cannot afford wasteful overbuilding. WISPA looks forward to providing comments in NTIA’s proceeding and appreciates NTIA’s willingness to engage with stakeholders to fine-tune the details to ensure states can flexibly use alternative technologies like uFWA and LEOs to make BEAD a success. – Steve Schwerbel, WISPA State Advocacy Manager
Critics and Challenges
Despite its benefits, technology neutrality has its critics. Some argue that prioritizing multiple technologies could dilute efforts to build the most reliable and future-proof infrastructure. Fiber, for instance, offers unmatched speed and reliability but comes with higher upfront costs. Critics worry that short-term solutions could hinder long-term progress. However, advocates counter that technology neutrality does not mean abandoning fiber or other high-capacity solutions. Instead, it provides a pragmatic framework for connecting communities while planning future upgrades.
The Road Ahead
As broadband funding programs continue to roll out, the principle of technology neutrality will play a pivotal role in shaping deployment strategies. Policymakers, industry leaders, and community advocates agree that a flexible approach is crucial for ensuring equitable connectivity across the United States.
Technology neutrality offers a path to inclusive and equitable broadband deployment. Focusing on outcomes rather than specific methods empowers communities to overcome geographic, financial, and technical barriers to connectivity. As federal programs evolve and infrastructure projects take shape, advocates hope that technology neutrality will remain a guiding principle, ensuring that no one is left behind in the digital age.
References:
-
NTCA Statement on Technology Neutrality: NTCA Official Website
-
R Street Article by Jonathan Cannon: R Street
- WISPA Other Technologies Needed to Make BEAD Succeed: WISPA
- WIA Statement on Flexibility in Choosing Broadband Technologies for BEAD Grants: WIA Official Website
By adopting technology neutrality, policymakers and industry leaders can bridge the digital divide and build a more connected future for all.
