In response to the FCC’s October inquiry into internet and phone providers’ customer service quality, broadband trade associations argue that competition compels them to deliver top-tier customer support. However, the claim that customers consistently receive “high-quality” service may come as a surprise to many who have faced long wait times, unclear billing, and other frustrations.
Broadband and wireless trade associations have responded to the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) inquiry into the state of customer service in the telecommunications industry, asserting that competition in the broadband market ensures high-quality support for customers. The inquiry, launched in October, aims to evaluate the quality of customer care provided by internet and phone service providers.
In a recent filing, the NCTA – The Internet & Television Association, which represents major cable operators, claimed that its members are deeply committed to customer satisfaction. “In order to attract and retain customers, NCTA’s cable operator members continuously strive to ensure that the customer support they provide is effective and user-friendly,” the filing stated.
Similarly, USTelecom, a trade group whose members include major providers such as AT&T, Verizon, Frontier, and SpaceX, argued that customers already receive high-quality service due to the “competitive broadband market.” This, the group claims, drives providers to prioritize effective and responsive customer support.
These assertions, however, are likely to be met with skepticism by many consumers. A 2023 report from the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) found that internet service providers (ISPs) remain one of the lowest-rated industries in customer satisfaction, with frequent complaints about long wait times, poor communication, and billing issues.
The FCC’s inquiry seeks to determine whether regulatory intervention is necessary to improve customer service standards in the industry. This review comes amid growing concerns about the lack of meaningful competition in certain regions of the United States, where customers may have limited or no choice in broadband providers.
Critics argue that the industry’s claims of a highly competitive environment are not reflective of the experience in rural and underserved areas, where broadband monopolies or duopolies dominate. “Competition is not a universal truth in the broadband market,” noted a recent analysis from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance. “For millions of Americans, the notion of choosing a provider with better customer service is a distant reality.”
The FCC’s investigation includes a review of customer complaints and input from stakeholders to assess whether providers are meeting acceptable service standards. This could potentially lead to new regulations aimed at improving transparency and accountability in customer interactions.
For now, the debate underscores a disconnect between the industry’s claims of competitive pressure driving quality service and the experiences of many customers. As the FCC continues its review, the question remains whether existing market forces are enough to compel ISPs to improve—or whether regulatory measures are needed to ensure customers receive the service they deserve.
Read more on this topic:
