Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional cookies, also known as functionality cookies, enhance a website's performance and functionality. While they are not strictly necessary for the website to function, they provide additional features that improve the user experience.

 

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Always Active

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Targeting cookies, are used to deliver advertisements that are more relevant to the user's interests. These cookies track a user’s browsing habits and behavior across websites, enabling advertisers to create targeted ad campaigns and measure their effectiveness

The United States Capitol. Washington, D.C.

Legislative Proposal Aims to Revamp BEAD Program Amidst Ongoing Debates

Winncom-170
Rep. Richard Hudson, a North Carolina Republican, earlier this month introduced the Streamlining Program Efficiency and Expanding Deployment for BEAD Act, known as the SPEED for BEAD Act. He did so alongside members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology, which Hudson chairs.

In a significant legislative move, Representative Richard Hudson (R-NC) has introduced the Streamlining Program Efficiency and Expanding Deployment (SPEED) for BEAD Act, which aims to overhaul the existing Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program. This initiative seeks to address longstanding concerns about regulatory hurdles and technological biases that stakeholders argue have impeded the rapid deployment of broadband services across the United States.

Key Provisions of the SPEED for BEAD Act

  1. Program Renaming: The act proposes renaming the BEAD program to the Broadband Expansion, Access, and Deployment program, subtly shifting the focus from equity considerations to broader expansion goals.

  2. Technological Neutrality: The bill’s cornerstone is its emphasis on a technology-neutral approach, allowing various technologies—including satellite internet services—to compete for funding. This marks a departure from previous preferences for fiber-optic solutions.

  3. Regulatory Simplification: The act aims to eliminate what it describes as “burdensome” regulations related to labor, climate change, and pricing instituted under the previous administration. Proponents argue that these changes will reduce deployment costs and attract more participants to the program.

  4. Funding Allocation: The legislation ensures that funds are primarily directed toward deployment and workforce development, granting providers greater flexibility in selecting projects. Additionally, it proposes that unused funds be returned to the U.S. Treasury, altering the current provision that reallocates such funds to other states. 

Rationale Behind the Legislation

Representative Hudson and his co-sponsors contend that the existing BEAD program’s regulatory framework has stymied progress to the point where, to date, no funds have been deployed to connect households. Rural communities must be connected. That’s a matter of urgency. Hudson emphasized the current state of the program is unacceptable. Representative Hudson and his co-sponsors are actively working to ensure that BEAD will have the flexibility needed to deploy its funding.

Support from Industry Stakeholders

  • ACA Connects: President and CEO Grant Spellmeyer praised the bill for streamlining unnecessary requirements that have slowed deployment and expressed readiness to commence infrastructure projects promptly.

  • Fiber Broadband Association: President and CEO Gary Bolton commended the legislation for facilitating more efficient fiber broadband deployment and highlighted the goal of delivering sustainable infrastructure nationwide.

  • INCOMPAS: CEO Chip Pickering lauded the bill’s technology-agnostic stance and its potential to expedite network rollouts, thereby more effectively bridging the digital divide. 

Critiques and Potential Implications

  • Digital Inclusion: The act proposes removing eligibility for digital inclusion and adoption activities, which could hinder efforts to promote digital literacy and equitable access.

  • State Implementation Delays: Analysts caution that the proposed changes might require states to revise their plans, potentially delaying broadband deployment by a year or more. Blair Levin, a former FCC official, warned that such revisions could postpone infrastructure projects, counteracting the bill’s intent to accelerate deployment.

  • Technological Efficacy: The shift toward a technology-neutral approach has sparked debate over the efficacy of different broadband technologies. Critics argue that favoring satellite services over fiber-optic solutions could result in less reliable internet access for rural communities, thereby perpetuating the digital divide.

Context of the Legislative Initiative

Introducing the SPEED for BEAD Act coincides with a broader reassessment of the BEAD program. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick announced a comprehensive review aimed at adopting a technology-neutral stance and eliminating regulatory barriers. This review reflects ongoing discussions about balancing rapid deployment with the quality and sustainability of broadband infrastructure.

The SPEED for BEAD Act represents a pivotal effort to reform federal broadband deployment strategies, emphasizing flexibility and reduced regulation. While it has attracted support from industry stakeholders seeking expedited infrastructure development, concerns about potential delays, the exclusion of digital inclusion initiatives, and the effectiveness of various technologies underscore the complexities inherent in bridging the digital divide. As the legislative process unfolds, these debates will likely shape the future of broadband accessibility in the United States.

Ad_TwoHops_1040

AGL Staff Writer

AGL’s dedicated Staff Writers are experts in the digital ecosystem, focusing on developments across broadband, infrastructure, federal programs, technology, AI, and machine learning. They provide in-depth analysis and timely coverage on topics impacting connectivity and innovation, especially in underserved areas. With a commitment to factual reporting and clarity, AGL Staff Writers offer readers valuable insights on industry trends, policy changes, and technological advancements that shape the future of telecommunications and digital equity. Their work is essential for professionals seeking to understand the evolving landscape of broadband and technology in the U.S. and beyond.

More Stories

Enable Notifications OK No thanks